<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How TV companies 2.0 can make money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/08/how-will-television-companies-20-can-make-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/08/how-will-television-companies-20-can-make-money/</link>
	<description>The digital convergence of media, entertainment, marketing and PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheWayoftheWeb &#187; The revolution will be televised - for free&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/08/how-will-television-companies-20-can-make-money/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>TheWayoftheWeb &#187; The revolution will be televised - for free&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=345#comment-645</guid>
		<description>[...] talked about how TV companies can still monetise themselves, and at the moment, there&#8217;s a little opportunity for content that exists at the edges of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talked about how TV companies can still monetise themselves, and at the moment, there&#8217;s a little opportunity for content that exists at the edges of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles Palmer</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/08/how-will-television-companies-20-can-make-money/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=345#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Agree with @richard - great post Dan. Sad that the MCN daily was pulled :)

giles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with @richard &#8211; great post Dan. Sad that the MCN daily was pulled <img src='http://thewayoftheweb.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>giles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Millington</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/08/how-will-television-companies-20-can-make-money/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Millington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=345#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Brilliant points. I think you touch upon something quite fundamental about entertainment. The requirements for a product is changing. It&#039;s not the means of distribution that have to change, as much as it is the product. 

I blogged about something similar a month or two ago: http://www.feverbee.com/2008/06/wheres-the-money-in-social-television.html. 

I really liked this post. You&#039;re absolutely spot on about rewarding the true fans with extra. The free stuff (the traditional content) gets attention. Those that want to be more involved can pay a few pounds to access the additional content. Maybe get a code that gives them access to online interviews, contact details to speak with those who produced the show, unique forums, invitations to the next live show/filming/event etc...Maybe even let these people see the next film/show/performance in advance (ahead of the crowd!).

Alternatively, change the business model. Randy Pausch&#039;s last lecture paved the way for his book the following year. Free eBooks and musics are generating more speaking engagements and higher audiences at live events. That&#039;s a decent business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant points. I think you touch upon something quite fundamental about entertainment. The requirements for a product is changing. It&#8217;s not the means of distribution that have to change, as much as it is the product. </p>
<p>I blogged about something similar a month or two ago: <a href="http://www.feverbee.com/2008/06/wheres-the-money-in-social-television.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.feverbee.com/2008/06/wheres-the-money-in-social-television.html?referer=');">http://www.feverbee.com/2008/06/wheres-the-money-in-social-television.html</a>. </p>
<p>I really liked this post. You&#8217;re absolutely spot on about rewarding the true fans with extra. The free stuff (the traditional content) gets attention. Those that want to be more involved can pay a few pounds to access the additional content. Maybe get a code that gives them access to online interviews, contact details to speak with those who produced the show, unique forums, invitations to the next live show/filming/event etc&#8230;Maybe even let these people see the next film/show/performance in advance (ahead of the crowd!).</p>
<p>Alternatively, change the business model. Randy Pausch&#8217;s last lecture paved the way for his book the following year. Free eBooks and musics are generating more speaking engagements and higher audiences at live events. That&#8217;s a decent business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stirlyn</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/08/how-will-television-companies-20-can-make-money/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Stirlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=345#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Definitely agree with the main comments you&#039;ve made here.  Companies who try to keep to the old models for making money rather than embracing the new business models are going to find themselves in a pickle down the road. It&#039;s much easier for me to go to a reputable source to get music than hunt around in the deep porn infested nether-regions of the download sites. If you remove the barriers people will use your service plain and simple, and they won&#039;t mind paying for it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agree with the main comments you&#8217;ve made here.  Companies who try to keep to the old models for making money rather than embracing the new business models are going to find themselves in a pickle down the road. It&#8217;s much easier for me to go to a reputable source to get music than hunt around in the deep porn infested nether-regions of the download sites. If you remove the barriers people will use your service plain and simple, and they won&#8217;t mind paying for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
