<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More fuel for the record company bonfire&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/more-fuel-for-the-record-company-bonfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/more-fuel-for-the-record-company-bonfire/</link>
	<description>The digital convergence of media, entertainment, marketing and PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/more-fuel-for-the-record-company-bonfire/comment-page-1/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=450#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>So saying that the music audience over the age of 20 is more familiar with music in physical formats than those under 20 is ageist?

Or the fact they are more likely to have financial commitments, careers, houses etc?

I&#039;m not saying people over 20 or 30 can&#039;t be downloading music illegally, or won&#039;t know how - I&#039;m just saying that they&#039;re not going to be as tied in, in general, to digital formats, and more likely to revert to physical formats. Plus they have more assets to be sued for.

They&#039;re also, in general, going to have less disposable income for entertainment, particularly in the current financial crisis. I spend far less on music etc than I did before - not due to piracy, but because my money goes on mortgages, heating, petrol etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So saying that the music audience over the age of 20 is more familiar with music in physical formats than those under 20 is ageist?</p>
<p>Or the fact they are more likely to have financial commitments, careers, houses etc?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying people over 20 or 30 can&#8217;t be downloading music illegally, or won&#8217;t know how &#8211; I&#8217;m just saying that they&#8217;re not going to be as tied in, in general, to digital formats, and more likely to revert to physical formats. Plus they have more assets to be sued for.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re also, in general, going to have less disposable income for entertainment, particularly in the current financial crisis. I spend far less on music etc than I did before &#8211; not due to piracy, but because my money goes on mortgages, heating, petrol etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaon</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/more-fuel-for-the-record-company-bonfire/comment-page-1/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>eaon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=450#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>still with the age-ist thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still with the age-ist thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
