Saving print media- at least part of it
Dan Thornton | October 19, 2008I’ve got a hunch that might develop into a theory with a bit of love and attention, and though it was worth sharing.
We all know that print media is in decline - ranging from slight drops to terminal free fall depending on the market. But does this mean print will cease to exist?
Or will there always be a print market as a niche of the digital world, in the same way as vinyl still exists as a viable niche within the music industry?
Ignoring the fact that an ageing part of the population will prefer print for a few more years to come, are there ways to ensure that people under 30 engage with print in some way? After all many vinyl sales over recent years are not aimed at an ageing population, but at a young, cool, DJ market who choose it over mixing with MP3s and CDs even now.
In this way, vinyl becomes remarkable, a talking point, and a Purple Cow. It signifies you’re a DJ, with either skills that require vinyl, or retro taste, and that you’re willing to go further to obtain a particular song in the format you want - whether it’s a new record, or a collectible classic.
I’ve been thinking about how print could become remarkable again, having achieved it as a medium for spreading the news before the arrival of mass radio and TV, and as a home of great content. Why, even in the face of decline, is there not more experimentation? For instance, with the impact of the financial crisis, why wouldn’t a broadsheet try printing a 5 page version, with only financial news, and selling it for a far lower price? (Perhaps the costs of printing and distribution etc might be overcome by mass sales and the publicity?).
Perhaps more titles need to look at the sales of anthology editions of certain brands - for instance videogame magazines Edge and RetroGamer have both published anthology editions which can command high prices on ebay.
Or a hand-printed, collectible newspaper? The Manual was actually distributed a week or so ago as an attempt to reawake the idea of print as collectible and powerful.
Empire magazine has always had some interesting cover ideas (Disclosure I work for publishers Bauer Media), like the 100 different covers for their recent rundown of the 500 Greatest Movies of All Time. As well as the famous quotes on the spine of the magazine.
Some magazines have experiment with size, mostly going to A5 ‘handbag size’ for the female market. (Male mag Jack failed despite writing which echoed the days when Loaded magazine had articles worth reading). But as the market is changing so rapidly, maybe there’s something more that could be tried?
Or considering a brand like Moleskine evokes a sense of luxury and culture in notepads, perhaps small runs of magazines could appeal to that market?
It’s late and my memory is failing me, so I’ll ask if anyone has any more ideas and examples of the extraordinary and remarkable?
Disclosure: I work for Bauer Media, which has a large portfolio of magazines in the UK. Nothing here indicates any projects that I know of. Any original ideas written in the comments remain the property of the author - however, if someone does come up with an amazing idea, it’s likely you might get an email from me. If you’d rather express your idea in private, please do email me at thewayoftheweb at googlemail.com









What do you think about adopting high level personalization to
Don | October 20, 2008What do you think about adopting high level personalization to give the subscriber more of what they want? It seems easier than introducing a collection of new niche players.
The technology is there waiting for sufficient, organized demand to justify the investment.
Print on demand could easily meet the needs of high
Angus Farquhar | October 20, 2008Print on demand could easily meet the needs of high level personalisation. But publishers seem to be running scared from it at the moment and instead using it as an over-priced alternative to buying in the shops.
It’s being treated in exactly the same way as e-subs used to be. Priced high to stop the masses using it as an alternative to traditional print and pitched as just a luxury service for those that can’t get the normal copy any other way.
I think we are still a long way from the point where publishers are comfortable with trying things that are new and radical and if we are not careful they will have to really struggle before they catch up with the rest of the world.
It’s hard enough to get them to engage meaningfully in the digital world, let alone mess around with the identity of their core staples, even if they are in decline.
But back to Dan’s original point. I think that depth and flow are the key things that distinguish print from digital. when I read online, 90% of the time all I want is a quick update on what is going on with top line facts that keep me informed on as many topics as possible. I rarely sit for hours and read one or two things.
In print though, I am quite happy to sit for days (on the rare occasion I have a weekend to myself) and read. I will read articles several thousand words long. I even subscribe to fiction magazine that I read (almost) cover to cover. The only bits I skip are the news and reviews, which are the kind of thing I could easily get online if I wanted to.