Comments on: What wouldn’t Google do? http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/what-wouldnt-google-do/ Digital Content, Marketing and Disruptive Technology Consultancy Fri, 18 May 2012 01:27:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Thursday Thirteen, 23 « The Third Degree http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/what-wouldnt-google-do/#comment-3535 Thursday Thirteen, 23 « The Third Degree Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:11:38 +0000 http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=470#comment-3535 [...] What wouldn’t Google do? [...] [...] What wouldn’t Google do? [...]

]]> By: New Experimental Google Search Features | LucaFiligheddu.com http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/what-wouldnt-google-do/#comment-3412 New Experimental Google Search Features | LucaFiligheddu.com Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:23:45 +0000 http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=470#comment-3412 [...] What wouldn’t Google do? [...] [...] What wouldn’t Google do? [...]

]]> By: Google Chrome Crashed…Again. | Ryan A Graves.com http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/what-wouldnt-google-do/#comment-2727 Google Chrome Crashed…Again. | Ryan A Graves.com Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:23:36 +0000 http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=470#comment-2727 [...] What wouldn’t Google do? [...] [...] What wouldn’t Google do? [...]

]]> By: david cushman http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/what-wouldnt-google-do/#comment-2725 david cushman Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:51:39 +0000 http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=470#comment-2725 What google does is actually what microsoft did too. Backs several horses - as you say. But it's not quite the all-bases covered model you describe. For a deeper understanding of the evolutionary model they use, take a look at The Origins of Wealth (you'll find it in the recommended books at bottom of any page on my blog). Google has understood that the economy, like the internet and like evolution, is a complex adaptive system. It uses the 'fitness landscape' model to find its 'hits'. And it lets that landscape drive where it focuses resources. There, my 'what would google do?' is a little longer than yours - but not much ;-) What google does is actually what microsoft did too. Backs several horses – as you say.
But it’s not quite the all-bases covered model you describe. For a deeper understanding of the evolutionary model they use, take a look at The Origins of Wealth (you’ll find it in the recommended books at bottom of any page on my blog). Google has understood that the economy, like the internet and like evolution, is a complex adaptive system. It uses the ‘fitness landscape’ model to find its ‘hits’. And it lets that landscape drive where it focuses resources.

There, my ‘what would google do?’ is a little longer than yours – but not much ;-)

]]> By: david cushman http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/10/what-wouldnt-google-do/#comment-5718 david cushman Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:51:00 +0000 http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=470#comment-5718 What google does is actually what microsoft did too. Backs several horses - as you say. But it's not quite the all-bases covered model you describe. For a deeper understanding of the evolutionary model they use, take a look at The Origins of Wealth (you'll find it in the recommended books at bottom of any page on my blog). Google has understood that the economy, like the internet and like evolution, is a complex adaptive system. It uses the 'fitness landscape' model to find its 'hits'. And it lets that landscape drive where it focuses resources. There, my 'what would google do?' is a little longer than yours - but not much ;-) What google does is actually what microsoft did too. Backs several horses – as you say.
But it’s not quite the all-bases covered model you describe. For a deeper understanding of the evolutionary model they use, take a look at The Origins of Wealth (you’ll find it in the recommended books at bottom of any page on my blog). Google has understood that the economy, like the internet and like evolution, is a complex adaptive system. It uses the ‘fitness landscape’ model to find its ‘hits’. And it lets that landscape drive where it focuses resources.

There, my ‘what would google do?’ is a little longer than yours – but not much ;-)

]]>