<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m not looking for the wisdom of crowds&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/</link>
	<description>Digital Content, Marketing and Disruptive Technology Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Find your tribe(s). &#171; eCairn&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Find your tribe(s). &#171; eCairn&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Thornton has a short post about the wisdom of my crowd. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Thornton has a short post about the wisdom of my crowd. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the interesting comments. 

@Rob - I definitely agree that resources like Wikipedia etc, and those topics outside my network definitely provide a resource, although do find my first instinct is to ask my network via Twitter etc, and then use Wikipedia.

@laurent - I think many people have encountered the echo chamber since the earliest newsgroups and forums! Social Media Monitoring/Buzz Monitoring tools are slightly different, as they aggregate individual posts, comments and thoughts etc. And generally they provide a more quantitative result, with the facility to more easily see the vocal qualitative results, rather than aggregating the thoughts of people around the blogosphere, for example, into a most popular improvement to your website, for example.

There&#039;s definitely a role for crowdsourcing, but it&#039;s choosing the most appropriate tool for the task, rather than assuming that plugging in a random crowd will solve everything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the interesting comments. </p>
<p>@Rob &#8211; I definitely agree that resources like Wikipedia etc, and those topics outside my network definitely provide a resource, although do find my first instinct is to ask my network via Twitter etc, and then use Wikipedia.</p>
<p>@laurent &#8211; I think many people have encountered the echo chamber since the earliest newsgroups and forums! Social Media Monitoring/Buzz Monitoring tools are slightly different, as they aggregate individual posts, comments and thoughts etc. And generally they provide a more quantitative result, with the facility to more easily see the vocal qualitative results, rather than aggregating the thoughts of people around the blogosphere, for example, into a most popular improvement to your website, for example.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s definitely a role for crowdsourcing, but it&#8217;s choosing the most appropriate tool for the task, rather than assuming that plugging in a random crowd will solve everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-5777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-5777</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the interesting comments. 

@Rob - I definitely agree that resources like Wikipedia etc, and those topics outside my network definitely provide a resource, although do find my first instinct is to ask my network via Twitter etc, and then use Wikipedia.

@laurent - I think many people have encountered the echo chamber since the earliest newsgroups and forums! Social Media Monitoring/Buzz Monitoring tools are slightly different, as they aggregate individual posts, comments and thoughts etc. And generally they provide a more quantitative result, with the facility to more easily see the vocal qualitative results, rather than aggregating the thoughts of people around the blogosphere, for example, into a most popular improvement to your website, for example.

There&#039;s definitely a role for crowdsourcing, but it&#039;s choosing the most appropriate tool for the task, rather than assuming that plugging in a random crowd will solve everything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the interesting comments. </p>
<p>@Rob &#8211; I definitely agree that resources like Wikipedia etc, and those topics outside my network definitely provide a resource, although do find my first instinct is to ask my network via Twitter etc, and then use Wikipedia.</p>
<p>@laurent &#8211; I think many people have encountered the echo chamber since the earliest newsgroups and forums! Social Media Monitoring/Buzz Monitoring tools are slightly different, as they aggregate individual posts, comments and thoughts etc. And generally they provide a more quantitative result, with the facility to more easily see the vocal qualitative results, rather than aggregating the thoughts of people around the blogosphere, for example, into a most popular improvement to your website, for example.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s definitely a role for crowdsourcing, but it&#8217;s choosing the most appropriate tool for the task, rather than assuming that plugging in a random crowd will solve everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>Interesting and I tend to agree with you especially with the info overload of those days. Crowds tend to be just huge echo chambers and you don&#039;t get much out of it that you don&#039;t already know (besides the case described by the previous commenter). Transposing what you said to the enterprise, I see the need for the same wisdom (though there may be as many &#039;my crowds&#039; as they&#039;re individual groups in a given enterprise) So then, why are &#039;social media monitoring&#039; tools so much in favor nowadays? All they give is the wisdow of crowds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and I tend to agree with you especially with the info overload of those days. Crowds tend to be just huge echo chambers and you don&#8217;t get much out of it that you don&#8217;t already know (besides the case described by the previous commenter). Transposing what you said to the enterprise, I see the need for the same wisdom (though there may be as many &#8216;my crowds&#8217; as they&#8217;re individual groups in a given enterprise) So then, why are &#8216;social media monitoring&#8217; tools so much in favor nowadays? All they give is the wisdow of crowds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-5776</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-5776</guid>
		<description>Interesting and I tend to agree with you especially with the info overload of those days. Crowds tend to be just huge echo chambers and you don&#039;t get much out of it that you don&#039;t already know (besides the case described by the previous commenter). Transposing what you said to the enterprise, I see the need for the same wisdom (though there may be as many &#039;my crowds&#039; as they&#039;re individual groups in a given enterprise) So then, why are &#039;social media monitoring&#039; tools so much in favor nowadays? All they give is the wisdow of crowds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and I tend to agree with you especially with the info overload of those days. Crowds tend to be just huge echo chambers and you don&#8217;t get much out of it that you don&#8217;t already know (besides the case described by the previous commenter). Transposing what you said to the enterprise, I see the need for the same wisdom (though there may be as many &#8216;my crowds&#8217; as they&#8217;re individual groups in a given enterprise) So then, why are &#8216;social media monitoring&#8217; tools so much in favor nowadays? All they give is the wisdow of crowds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Williams</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>I like this thought, but it depends on what sort of info I&#039;m looking for.  I agree that I have my chosen and filtered crowd that I listen to already.  However, for things that are outside the wisdom of &#039;my crowd&#039; I like to go elsewhere - like wikipedia for example.  My crowd doesn&#039;t know what &#039;they&#039; know.  I turn to my crowd for what I know they are experts on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this thought, but it depends on what sort of info I&#8217;m looking for.  I agree that I have my chosen and filtered crowd that I listen to already.  However, for things that are outside the wisdom of &#8216;my crowd&#8217; I like to go elsewhere &#8211; like wikipedia for example.  My crowd doesn&#8217;t know what &#8216;they&#8217; know.  I turn to my crowd for what I know they are experts on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Williams</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-5775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-5775</guid>
		<description>I like this thought, but it depends on what sort of info I&#039;m looking for.  I agree that I have my chosen and filtered crowd that I listen to already.  However, for things that are outside the wisdom of &#039;my crowd&#039; I like to go elsewhere - like wikipedia for example.  My crowd doesn&#039;t know what &#039;they&#039; know.  I turn to my crowd for what I know they are experts on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this thought, but it depends on what sort of info I&#8217;m looking for.  I agree that I have my chosen and filtered crowd that I listen to already.  However, for things that are outside the wisdom of &#8216;my crowd&#8217; I like to go elsewhere &#8211; like wikipedia for example.  My crowd doesn&#8217;t know what &#8216;they&#8217; know.  I turn to my crowd for what I know they are experts on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangejack (Rob Williams)</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-3917</link>
		<dc:creator>orangejack (Rob Williams)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-3917</guid>
		<description>great post on wisdom of MY crowd. i commented there. you too? http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post on wisdom of MY crowd. i commented there. you too? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/tinyurl.com/6auvlp?referer=');">http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangejack (Rob Williams)</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-3916</link>
		<dc:creator>orangejack (Rob Williams)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-3916</guid>
		<description>great post on wisdom of MY crowd. i commented there. you too? http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post on wisdom of MY crowd. i commented there. you too? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/tinyurl.com/6auvlp?referer=');">http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangejack (Rob Williams)</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2008/11/im-not-looking-for-the-wisdom-of-crowds/#comment-5778</link>
		<dc:creator>orangejack (Rob Williams)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/?p=554#comment-5778</guid>
		<description>great post on wisdom of MY crowd. i commented there. you too? http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post on wisdom of MY crowd. i commented there. you too? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/tinyurl.com/6auvlp?referer=');">http://tinyurl.com/6auvlp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

