TheWayoftheWeb

The digital convergence of media, entertainment, marketing and PR

TheWayoftheWeb header image 2

Stop grouping and griping – start thinking and doing

December 19th, 2008 · Comments

It’s tempting to think that social media is a good place to be right now – after all, there’s good evidence it’s one of the few areas of growing employement.

There’s also plenty of talk about how it’s going to grow as a low cost/more effective way to engage people, and therefore drive revenue – but also harder to measure. And it can be hard to tell who is bluffing, at least until someone came up with a checklist!

So we spend our time joining groups and chatting with our peers, whether it’s on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Ning, etc, etc.

PAR-TIC-I-PA-TION by cindiann on Flickr (CC Licence)

PAR-TIC-I-PA-TION by cindiann on Flickr (CC Licence)

But the one question we need to keep asking is whether each group is really worth joining, and whether we’re actually going to have the time and dedication to make a difference.

It’s something I’ll admit to being guilty of. There’s Social Media Mafia, MeasurementCamp, Social Media Club, Social Media Today, P2PR, EverySingleOneofUs,  just off the top of my head, plus Triiibes, which prompted this post when I thought about how much value others are getting from it – and I’m missing because I’ve spread myself out so much. And some groups, such as the Blog Council, are attracting some criticism. As indeed WOMMA has in this case.

Then add in several Facebook groups, a few LinkedIn groups, and others I’ve forgotten – and suddenly it’s sounding ridiculous, even though I’ve increasingly only tried to be involved in groups with a reasonably clear and defined purpose.

Credentials Required by TheTruthAbout... on Flickr (CC Licence)

Credentials Required by TheTruthAbout... on Flickr (CC Licence)

I’ve already started politely resigning from a few places, because I’m barely even remembering to check in and see what’s happening once in a while, let alone contribute to anything of value – from now on it’s about having a real focus on what matters to me personally and for my career, and selecting a smaller collection of key groups who I can offer value to (and perhaps where interlinks can be found).

Perhaps this is what Twitter has really affected for me – in the past I was a pretty active member of a variety of groups and forums, but now they don’t seem so important, as I’ve got an expanding network of over 1900 in my community for instant responses on a variety of topics, rather than forcing myself to go and check in somewhere else.  The common complaint was that it detracted from blogging, but I tend to find the opposite – but I do find myself spending less time at other social locations, unless it’s a real focused community.

Perhaps it’s just me, and the fact I’ve got a great and involving day job, two blogs, and a young family to think about now? I know from forum involvement for a decade that there’s also a cyclical nature to forum membership – the new excitement, the start of seeing repetition from other members, taking a break and then coming back with new enthusiasm etc….

And I do know some people who seem to benefit from seemingly being in almost every group on every network ever created.

But what do you think? Have you been a little guilty of serial group joining without considering the value? Found yourself stretched too thin? Or do you think it’s fine to be a silent member in places on the off chance people might find you and request a connection/contribution?

And where have you found the clearest sense of purpose/best value?

1 Total TweetBacks: (Tweet this post)
  • cgw3: Stop grouping and griping - start thinking and doing http://tinyurl.com/4ljwns 12/19/08 06:36pm

Tags: social media marketing

  • It is always about selecting the right places to be, but being quick about it, which isn't always easy.

    Just like Dan, I get around, but I prefer not to bow out of those places that I frequent less. Why? If they're free, it's as well to be there and not be active than to not be there at all.

    I've found that people look for me by name in some of the places I've got an account, but am inactive in.

    But to reiterate Dan's point, you also have to conserve your social media energy as much as possible, and avoid "mission creep", which will, quite literally wear you out...
  • I see this as a time management challenge. If we accept there's a truck load of groups and a truck load of causes at a truck load of locations we are left with decisions.

    Decisions of where to invest our attention.

    Having a personal currency exchange rate is needed.

    What is the modality and value you demand in return to match a potential investment of attention?

    In my opinion, working out the above (which requires working out what your 'meaning of life' is), makes everything around this subject neatly slot into place.

    Confusion clears, bandwidth widens and the radio static of emerging activities becomes pleasant background to your main thing.

    And the main thing is to keep the main thing, the main thing.
  • I think you're right that there's so many groups out there you don't which one you're able to join and which you shouldn't bother with. I don't even think it's the ROI that should persuade you to stick at a group of SM, it should be one that's fun and one you're happy at working on.

    If it's fun, you'll organically get the best out of it, as people can identiy with it and share and bask in your enthusiasim!
  • David Cushman.
    dan. I think it's the adhoc nature of group forming network theory that is being revealed here. The way we can express our-right-now purpose is improving so we are more able to flit from group to group as our purposes change. We amplify that which we value and dampen out that which we don't. That's complex adaptive systems for you!
    Communities aren't for life. Some may not even be for Christmas.
    A merry one to you, btw. :-)
  • Stop grouping and griping - start thinking and doing http://tinyurl.com/4ljwns
  • Dan:

    I definitely have primary socnets, Twitter and Facebook. The rest are just acts of convenience. It's better to have an actual community than beachheads everywhere, but no real tangible contacts to work with. good post and thanks for the link!

    Geoff
  • I totally agree that it's not about different technologies - it's totally about the focus and drive.

    That's partly why I don't think microblogging will ever replace the function of long form blogging - it's much harder to explain the reasoning, focus and clarity around a thought to more than one person and without 20 messages!

    I think for me, I was just amazed at myself for feeling bad about not contributing enough to some key communities - and realising how many I'd signed up for over the past year or two and never attempted to engage with - and how many times I've seen other people doing the same thing.

    People can start 100 groups to try and achieve something and none of them will get anywhere without the required enthusiasm and effort...
  • I have come across a lot of social networking sites that serve no purpose. You sign up, you add friends, you add your links... well that's just about it. What's the point in that?

    I didn't get into Twitter until I discovered TweetDeck. Now I use it a lot more than I used to. However, not everyone is on Twitter at the same time, and there's a lot to keep up with - even when you don't follow 1000+ people. It's easy to miss things on Twitter because there is so much being said.

    I recently set up a blogging forum and it seems to be doing quite well. Focus is the key - the forum is aimed at helping bloggers, but is also a good place to chat. Years ago I used to participate in several general chat forums, but they don't do anything for me anymore. Too many long threads with thousands of replies that aren't really about anything anymore.

    I'm reluctant to sign up to lots of new sites as I'd forget about them too, but a blogging forum can be a great way to interact with people who might not see your comments on Twitter. A forum may be quieter and less immediate, but sometimes it is nice to have more than 140 characters to elaborate on why you feel a certain way about something, without constantly linking out to blog posts.

    In essence a forum works in a similar way to a blog with comments - and there's still a place for blogs, right?
blog comments powered by Disqus