<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And I&#8217;m back in the top 50 UK marketing blogs&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/</link>
	<description>Digital Content, Marketing and Disruptive Technology Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5149</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5149</guid>
		<description>Apparently not you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently not you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>Apparently not you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently not you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5031</link>
		<dc:creator>rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5031</guid>
		<description>who gives a fuck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who gives a fuck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5029</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon - nice to know I&#039;m not alone, and looks like the best blogs are obviously all around the 50 mark!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me, the main point of rankings is that if I rank highly, new people might discover me, and I might form more meaningful relationships with some of them...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s about it really..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon &#8211; nice to know I&#39;m not alone, and looks like the best blogs are obviously all around the 50 mark!</p>
<p>For me, the main point of rankings is that if I rank highly, new people might discover me, and I might form more meaningful relationships with some of them&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#39;s about it really..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Collister</title>
		<link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5028</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewayoftheweb.net/2009/09/and-im-back-in-the-top-50-uk-marketing-blogs/#comment-5028</guid>
		<description>Hey. Congrats Dan. I did a quick look and I&#039;m at #56 :( But like you having the rigours of a demanding job and young son hasn&#039;t helped output.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I do have a perennial issue with league tables: they always measure a random set of criteria that presumes everyone wants to measure the same thing. Or alternatively: they&#039;re a mass media/mass knowledge tool. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, it&#039;s true my blog output has dwindled recently - but I feel that some of my recent posts have been much more in-depth and rigorous than before. So if AdAge added &#039;thoughtfulness&#039; to its ranking I reckon I&#039;d score higher!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I aalways feel obliged to try to get the highest ranking possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. Congrats Dan. I did a quick look and I&#39;m at #56 <img src='http://thewayoftheweb.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  But like you having the rigours of a demanding job and young son hasn&#39;t helped output.</p>
<p>But I do have a perennial issue with league tables: they always measure a random set of criteria that presumes everyone wants to measure the same thing. Or alternatively: they&#39;re a mass media/mass knowledge tool. </p>
<p>For example, it&#39;s true my blog output has dwindled recently &#8211; but I feel that some of my recent posts have been much more in-depth and rigorous than before. So if AdAge added &#39;thoughtfulness&#39; to its ranking I reckon I&#39;d score higher!</p>
<p>That said, I aalways feel obliged to try to get the highest ranking possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

