Private companies, ID cards, data and employees

Anyone else making a link between the uproar when UK Home Secretary Jacqui Smith revealed plans for private businesses like chemists and photo shops to record fingerprints and biometric data for the proposed national identity card scheme, and the news now that T-Mobile UK employees have been caught selling consumer data to outsiders?

Data is valuable, and valuable things are a target for people to try and obtain via nefarious means. And while I’m sure the employees of my local chemists are doubtless wonderful people, I’m not sure they’re paid and monitored enough to ensure they could never be tempted to accidentally pass on some details at some point.

As data becomes increasingly valuable, companies need to ensure they meet all legal regulations and ethical guidelines, and also think about who has access to the data, and for what reason. And whether or not they should be trying to put those people away from temptation in some way.

Or just make the move towards VRM and let me look after my own data.

Videogames, morality, the media, and Modern Warfare

The mainstream media interest in videogames has generally only been sparked by the regular doses of outrage at whichever game is currently corrupting our children. Which is why I’ve been so absorbed by the coverage of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, in which you go undercover and become part of a terrorist act – and also the media coverage which seems to be a more balanced and mature look at video game morality than we’ve previously had (Probably because most people in their 30s have grown up with videogames and are reasonably likely to have a current generation console in their house).

Two thoughts initially sprang to mind:

1. The morality questions comes round every 6 months, and has done since the days of the Spectrum and Commodore 64. Aside from the comical notion of the media outcry over Night Trap, for example, in which the most offensive thing was the acting, there have also been dilemmas put in front of gamers for a while now – if not quite as explicit as this choice.

In one edition of the World War 2 series Medal of Honour, for example, you encountered a group of unarmed German soldiers sat around the campfire, and could either sneak past, or shoot them in the back – and either option resulted in the game continuing as before – the only result was to have the player consider the moral implications. (Possibly more for me than most, as I’d been reading Michael Walzer’s ‘Just and Unjust Wars’ for a history class at university around the same time!)

2. Even in games where there is no explicit moral dilemma or mechanic players have used their own imagination for years to fill in such gaps. And with online gaming, our encounters with other humans is leading to questions of etiquette and morals in a way which is entirely compatible with the physical world, even if it’s played out differently. For instance, have a read of ‘Bow, Nigger, an article often referenced as spearheading games journalism away from simply rating graphics on a score of 1-10, and instead starting to look at the feelings and emotions players encounter, for example.

And that’s before we even start mentioning Second Life and World of Warcraft.

Did you really believe President Obama was using Twitter?

Although most people will have assumed that the @BarackObama account was staffed by members of his team and White House staff, it was easy to hope that a Blackberry-addicted new President might occasionally sneak a tweet in – especially given the account is always in the first-person, and given messages such as ‘Humbled’ on winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

But it turns out almost 2.7 million people are following the President’s team rather than the man himself, after he spoke in a Q&A session in Shanghai which was streamed on the internet. In it, he fielded a question about Twitter. His answer?

I have never used Twitter but I’m an advocate of technology and not restricting internet access.

It’s a pity this hasn’t been made clear on the account, or that he hasn’t been able to at least check in a couple of times to see what the fuss is about.

Interestingly, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs also claimed in July (incorrectly as it turned out), that Twitter was blocked on official White House computers.

It seems that social media hasn’t been quite as pervasive in the Obama administration as you might have assumed.

HT to Breaking News Online, Read Write Web and Techcrunch.

A blogging break…

Due to injury and illness, blogging is taking a back seat at the moment…

Apologies and normal service will be resumed as soon as possible…