Should Twitter lose limits like 140 characters?

Should Twitter let you post more than 140 characters, include more metadata in tweets, or include embedded images?

Two prominent internet voices, Dave Winer and Robert Scoble have both recently posted their views on how Twitter should improve it’s core product. Dave Winer proposes that using the basis of SMS as a reason for not expanding the core capabilities of the service is wrong, and that Twitter is really SMS 2.0.

Meanwhile Robert Scoble uses the claim Twitter’s web traffic is flat to suggest 14 ways for the service to become more engaging. Number 1 is to remove the 140 character limit and to allow photos and videos in line to ‘communicate something more than the metaphorical equivalent of a grunt.’

The question is whether either of them is right – from a more technical standpoint, I think there’s a valid viewpoint that Twitter could expand the data accompanying a tweet in some way to give more value when it’s referenced by other services.

But I think it’s an incredibly bad idea for Twitter to lose the 140 character limit, and allow inline photos and videos.

For starters, a service already exists for that, called Facebook. Scoble references it as a more entertaining service for that reason, but I wouldn’t agree. Twitter is fun and engaging in creating conversations and quick observations – for both work and pleasure, whereas Facebook is a way to catch up on all the intimate details of your close family and friends.

It also ignores the myriad of ways that people interact with Twitter already – if I want the basic web service on PC or mobile it’s available. If I want greater adaptability, there’s Tweetdeck, Seesmic or many of the other clients. A huge number of clients are available to cater to almost every need – therefore removing the problem of Twitter attempting to do it. Every change made by a major social network is analysed endlessly, and attempting to please everyone results in something which pleases noone.

Increasing the scope of Twitter also infringes on the Twitter ecosystem of third party businesses – embedding images instantly removes the need for the likes of Twitpic, and suddenly increases storage costs for Twitter.

And suddenly you lose a unique network, and instead you have a Facebook also-ran.

So now – I don’t think we should lose the 140 character limit just yet.

  • http://www.RoyNaim.com Roy Naim

    Right on!!

    I think the limit allows for creativity and bring people on to their traffic by generating curiosity. The bit.ly , tinyurl , yfrog and all the others will be pointless as well. The fact that it's also limited allows for room to keep posting things and ramble on about whatever without have people getting annoyed.

    Facebook on the other hand is more personal-like and if you keep posting things…people will get annoyed.

    So maybe they can expand the amount but still keep it limited.

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    Thanks for the comment, and I think we both concur that constraints can actually lead to better creativity and art, which is a fairly common viewpoint. Suddenly the ecosystem disapears, and Twitter has to try to be all things for all people rather than concentrating on a core service which is still fairly new and in terms of size, still has plenty of room to grow…

  • http://www.stuartwitts.com/ Stuart Witts

    We all know the classic story of how the mechanical shark in Jaws repeatedly failed to work during filming, forcing Spielberg to be more creative in his direction thus leading to one of the greatest films of all-time. Having the 140 character limit forces us to distill our ramblings, leading to faster, more interesting conversation.

    As for the inclusion of photos and videos, this is already possible threw third-party sites. Why complicate the core service? Have we learned nothing from brands such as Google and Apple? If Twitter need to focus on anything, it's to ensure that the platform remains stable during high levels of activity.

  • http://twitter.com/DeLuca Cristina De Luca

    I agree with Dan Thornton and don’t think it should.

  • cathmary

    I completely agree — there should definitely be a limit. Not sure that it needs to be 140 char; it could be the 160 char limit of SMS text messages. Working within such a limit forces u to be concise.

  • http://twitter.com/vistainteractiv Vista Interactive

    Idea: What about using LT (for Linked Tweet or Long Tweet) to join tweets together.

  • http://marianneh.com/ Marianne

    I like the limit, but I do wish they would increase the limit to 200 characters.