Tempted to dismiss social media marketing as ‘just common sense’

The inevitable backlash against social media specialists has been growing recently. The problem seems mainly to stem from self-described ‘social media experts’ who aren’t able to back up their claims, despite the fact the same is true for a lot of other people attempting to promote themselves in other professions. For the record, the only time terms such as ‘expert’ or ‘thought leader’ should really be used is in reference to someone other than yourself!

One of the main reasons given for dismissing social media expertise is that ‘social media marketing is just common sense’. And despite the fact I’m hired to work for clients in the social media field, I’d say that’s true to some extent. The basic principles of social media such as being interesting, engaging in conversation etc are pretty much common sense – so I don’t need to run through the whole list.

But if common sense basic principles are enough to do without specialists then explain the following:

  • Budgeting is common sense but we still have accountants and financial advisors (and high levels of personal debt)
  • Being fit and healthy is common sense but we still have coaches and trainers.
  • Avoiding addictive substances is common sense but we still have problems with caffeine, nicotine, alcohol etc.

I think you might get my point, but essentially you can boil anything down to common sense – running the country, curing world hunger, or having a happy relationship and family life.

But we hire external experts because we either need them to help us plan how to do it, to support us in doing it, or to kick us into ensuring we do it. We hire them because they live and breathe that subject and will help us to surpass the common sense bits and take us into a more efficient and effective area.

And common sense is a rarely used tool.

I’ll leave it to someone like Mark Earls to fully explain how many of the decisions we post rationalise as ‘common sense’ are actually the result of other factors, such as following the herd.

And plenty of people have looked at why businesses regularly fail at anything approaching common sense. In fact corporations are often legally prevented from some common sense actions.

Common Sense

Common sense tends to be something that we refer to in hindsight, normally in response to a mistake. And often in response to mistakes in marketing and particularly in social media. We’ll ask why someone didn’t use their common sense, and inevitably see someone else do a similar thing within hours.

So the next time you find someone dismissing social media marketing, or anything else, as common sense, ask yourself how many qualified specialists they’ve dealt with in the last 24 hours. And if you’re worried about ‘social media experts’ the clue is to not look at their self-chosen title, but to look at their work, their references, their reputation, and their results. If that’s all missing, it isn’t a problem with social media, it just conforms to Sturgeons Law like everything else.

 

BBC’s The Apprentice needs a disclaimer

One of the few TV programmes I end up watching against my better judgement is BBC’s The Apprentice, which never fails to provide irritation and bemusement in equal measure. Ironically having created a mobile app in a previous challenge, this week the contestants were tasked with creating a print magazine, essentially acting out my career path in reverse.

One of the few positives is always the hilarious commentary provided by my Twitter network, and one very valuable suggestion appeared tonight courtesy of @kaigani

@kaigani tweets the apprentice needs a disclaimer

Now I know that The Apprentice is a reality gameshow and not a business documentary. It’s easy to forget that behind all the apparent analysis and insight, that it’s essentially Big Brother in the Boardroom, and I’m not going to start going into psychology when it comes to first perceptions, interviews or workplace performance.

But there are times when it really is legitmately painful.

Besides claims that engineers can’t run companies (Alan Mulally, CEO of Ford and originally an engineer, for example?), or Lord Sugar doesn’t need to be taught how to use a phone (Amstrad E-M@iler anyone?), it’s the judgements that tend to make me want the disclaimer more than anything.

So far we’ve had the better mobile app return a lower amount of downloads due to a crap app store description, and the better magazine idea return lower advertising revenue due to the refusal to negotiate at the end of the first pitch to an ad agency, for example.

Despite the fact that the losing idea and team would have been likely to be far more successful in the long run, the ‘rules’ state that they’re being judged purely on one number, generally the financial return.

At which point, the person responsible for the app store description and the refusal to negotiate is selected to survive for another week due to a perceived ‘glimmer’, and a candidate named Glen is fired primarily for being an engineer as far as anyone can tell.

  • If you’re going to claim that it’s all about the numbers, then you’ve wrecked that by ever seeing or meeting the candidates.
  • If you’re claiming it’s about someone you’re able to work with, then actually the decision could be made after the initial few minutes with them.
  • And if you think The Apprentice is about business, then presumably Fawlty Towers was a guide to hospitality management?

Obviously Lord Sugar has been hugely successful in business, but does that actually give him the best insight into what was responsible for his success, and would he have actually made it through his own gameshow?

The future of print is in the hands of small retailers

I was in St Albans yesterday for an interesting meeting with someone I can’t name about a project I can’t mention. But afterwards I had enough time to pop into Chaos City Comics, a small comic shop which has apparently been going for a couple of decades.

It’s a really nice friendly shop, and having overheard the owner go through the world of comics with someone buying on behalf of someone else, we ended up striking up a bit of a chat about the comic shop business, a forthcoming reboot for DC comics, and the future of print in a world of tablet computing and curated discovery.

It made me think a lot about the future of print – apparently the combination of high profile movies and new formats has encouraged new business into the shop for print comics. But will this continue when superhero movies may not be moneyspinners for the studios, and when more and more people might be reading everything on a screen to the exclusion of anything else?

One thing we did talk about which I think might have potential for comics in particular is a curated experience which is already being offered by some specialist record retailers. Rather than visiting a storefront with the rent and expense that incurs, you’re able to visit a small office in which you pour out all your musical preferences and interests, and in return you get an expert providing you with a suitable selection to sample and enjoy before parting with your cash for the ones you want to take away.

So what about the same for comics? As someone who has less time than ever to keep up with the latest news and issues, I’d love to be able to go to a friendly expert on a regular basis who could not only suggest and advise what new titles I should try, but also be able to provide the complete story arcs I should be reading on a regular basis…

A selection of comics

Image by KickTheBeat on Flickr (CC Licence)

 

Small retailers need to do more…

The other thing that stood out is that I had a great experience in store, but I’m not a St Albans regular, and coming home and finding the Chaos City website has been a little frustrating, as it could definitely be offering more – it’s a basic news service about the store at the moment, without any way for me to part with any money for starters.

And that seems to be the case with so many great little specialist shops – great owners and staff, great knowledge and expertise, and no really good way of being able to access it when you’re not in the shop itself.

And there’s no legitimate excuse for that in an era when print is in decline, and the likely future will be one of niche publishing in specific areas of interest. There are lots of not only effective, but also efficient ways to increase turnover and provide more ways to interested people to spend cash with you, in addition to building customer loyalty and improving customer service. And considering the amount of free and open source options available to create a really good web presence, it doesn’t have to be expensive – especially if you deal in comics and know someone susceptible to payment in back issues as well as cash ;)

SEO – Always worth revisiting the basics…

I’ve been offering SEO as a service to a growing number of clients for a while as both a standalone product, and also as part of everything I do in terms of content marketing and social media. Jumping into blogger outreach, social networking or blogging without a strategy which includes targetting relevant keywords and encouraging inbound links wastes quite a lot of the potential benefits and misses out on the chance for content, social media and SEO to amplify each other.

And much of good SEO practice starts with the basics, which is one reason why I really appreciated an invite to a day with SEO PR Training, who specialise in explaining the art of SEO to PR professionals, and the equally mystifying art of PR to SEO professionals. As someone who has worked with people in both camps, I can vouch for the fact that mutual understanding is unbelievably more effective for all concerned and can really give great benefits.

As a taster event, the attendees ranged in experience, so the training had to cover everything from a pretty basic level upwards, but the SEO PR duo of Claire and Nichola did a really good job of going through the building blocks really effectively (and with some nifty learning methods to make it quite fun), and then going into a lot more detail for the more advanced/geekier attendees. Ironically I ended up partnering with an old social media acquintance, @farhan, which meant we were instantly seen as the techies after an early exercise to list what things we do on our own sites regarding SEO – mainly because we ran out of space on our paper…

A couple of people asked why I’d come along if I already work in SEO, and I figured the reasons were worth sharing:

  • SEO is constantly changing, and it’s easy to get so involved in working on client sites and my own that it’s always good to get outside confirmation that Google hasn’t decided the sky is pink or Bing has gained 99% of the search market while I’ve been busy building keyword lists.
  • As someone who works to educate clients on best practice, it’s always good to see the training techniques being used in workshops in a more formal setting. I’m not suggesting I’m going to replicate Claire and Nichola’s exact exercises, but it definitely reminded me that learning/teaching SEO can be more fun than it sometimes appears.
  • One area which can get expensive is signing up and evaluating all the tools available for monitoring and analysing every element of digital marketing, and I’m always fascinated by what services other people use, and how they rate them.

Two elements of the day really stood out for me – one was a live attempt to rank for a specific phrase, based on an article published just before we broke for lunch. Utilising existing assets and social media, it was in the top two results by the time we came back after eating, which was a great way to provide a realtime example of both what’s possible, and what elements went into it.

The other stand-out was the analysis of an example site. In this case, one of mine! The good news for me and my clients is that it did pretty well in terms of keywords and links, and the recommendations that followed were things I’d been aware of, but hadn’t found time to sort due to my daily workload – but it was a great reminder that even my spare time projects need to follow the same structured approach that I apply to client website development and SEO, particularly if prospective SEO clients find me via those sites instead of client references!

So thanks again to the SEO PR Training team for a really useful and enjoyable day, and also a really good chat in the pub afterwards which gave me a chance to go into full geek mode! The follow-up emails with a jargon buster and a full list of all the useful tools mentioned on the day are also a handy touch…