2012 – the year of 3D printing?

It seems like I’ve been talking to people about 3D printing for ages, but it seems like momentum is really gathering for it at the moment as it starts to reach a wider audience, and with the news Makerbot Industries has just secured $10 million of funding.

Frustratingly, and out of character for me, I can’t find a blog post noting when I initially heard about it, although it must have been around 2009, as that was when the initial press reports started appearing, and I do remember being familiar with it before I read the awesome Makers by Cory Doctorow, which I then bought for my dad as a far more inspiring and clearer explanation of the possibilities than I could manage. And in addition to promising myself a Makerbot and Arduino board by the end of the year back in January, I’ve mentioned it to a lot of people over the last few years. In fact, my stock answer when people ask me for any tech prediction or investment tips has been ’3D printing and robotics’. The use of robots is delivering disruption in everything from bomb disposal to warehouse management, and 3D printing is going to have a more immediate impact on manufacturing in the very near future.

And as recently as this afternoon, I was reminded of one of Clarke’s laws – ‘Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic’, as I showed some very digitally savvy and clever people some Youtube videos to explain 3D printing and left them amazed.

One of the best examples is this video showing the manufacture of a wrench (or adjustable spanner in the UK) simply by scanning it in 3D and pressing ‘print’.

And the possibilities are amazing – already people are creating full sized replica motorcycles, working planes, guitars, sculptures, complex gear mechanisms, and a huge range of protyping applications which aren’t even being publicised, although this promo video for a printer gives some idea of the breadth of the options:

And of course, there’s Makerbot’s products, which can be purchased for under £1000 and then sit next to my home PC churning stuff out, before I can progress to the larger models:

Why is 3D Printing about to hit?

A few things seem to be heading towards the perfect 3D printing storm. Early adopters are already talking a lot about the opportunities, including many people I have a lot of time and respect for. The mainstream media are starting to pick up on it again, and explain it in a way which fascinates people. And when you think about the range of promotional merchandise which could be produced, for example, it’s easy to see that a company could actually save a fair amount of money by running their own 3D printer rather than using foreign labour and a intermediary company.

There’s also the financial situation for most people, and times of austerity often lead people to invest in better longterm products and solutions, including buying better quality products which will last, and looking for ways to fix and improve things rather than replacing them. Give me a way to replace all the broken parts of toys in the house, or various gadget parts, and I’ll soon have recovered the purchase price.

Then you’ve got the fact that you can already print 3D chocolate creations – bang goes the chocolatier industry – and Cornell University have already been looking at ways to produce all types of food from basic ‘food inks’, and even human organs and body parts.

It’s hard to imagine how many industries and businesses will be affected, and how quickly the disruption will take place, given the real world implications are far more immediate than even the digital disruption of the internet has managed. There are plenty of people who resisted going online, or didn’t see the benefits – show them a quick, cheap and easy hip replacement that works and has no waiting time and they can see why it’s worth it straight away!

The biggest challenge to 3D printing:

The only challenge to 3D Printing will be the bane of all disruptive digital technology – copyright. Both Makerbot and Fab@Home are open-source projects, and I have no doubt that any attempt to block access to the technology and raw materials of 3D printing will be immediately worked around.

The biggest problem will be whether existing industries can do anything to initiate copyright law not only for replacement parts for their specific products, but also newer ideas. And they’ve got a huge incentive – take motorcycle production, for example, where a £10,000 motorcycle built entirely from new spare parts would cost over £50,000.

3d printing will disrupt the world in the next 12 months

MIT are printing solar cells on pieces of paper, Enrico Dini can print buildings from dust, and the first human vein has already been created with 3d printing.

It’s almost impossible to envisage all the opportunities and implications of what this will bring – and if you’re looking for the easiest and cheapest ways to access the technology, there are already companies like Shapeways that will create whatever you’re able to upload. But although I did once wonder about opportunities for a similar business, it’s really a gateway company as the cost of owning your own production continues to fall to the point where your garden shed is a mini-fabrication facility for anything from paper models to human organs. And considering the cost of a Makerbot Thing-o-Matic is already down to $1299, it’ll be interesting to see how their new investment could lead to even further price reductions in the short term. That’s just from economies of scale etc with the existing technology, and not even accounting for the inevitable improvements in how 3D printers are actually made. Self-replication isn’t exactly unimaginable.

I don’t often gamble on making predictions for something as radically unpredictable as technology and the impact it will have on the world around us, but 3D Printing for me is beyond the introduction of the smartphone, and rivals both the internet, and even the invention of the computer. The question isn’t if it will be the most radical change since the industrial revolution – the only question is when…

  • http://www.eaonpritchard.blogspot.com eaon pritchard

    Agreed, I’ve secretly got one eye on this as a dark horse.

  • Duann

    2011 has already been huge for Shapeways,
    Here is to 2012 going on the same trajectory..

  • Jemacd

    I think the disruption has already started. Great post Dan. For further reading see also: http://www.jonathanmacdonald.com/?p=5595 and http://www.jonathanmacdonald.com/?p=5077

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    Cheers for the comment Eaon, and as you can probably tell, I reckon it’s not going to be a dark horse much longer!

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    I’m impressed with the social media monitoring by Shapeways, and certainly hope Shapeways continues to grow. It’s definitely a great way for people to start benefitting from 3D Printing without having to invest what is still a reasonable amount for a MakerBot etc, and I can only see it growing at the moment!

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    I’m impressed with the social media monitoring by Shapeways, and certainly hope Shapeways continues to grow. It’s definitely a great way for people to start benefitting from 3D Printing without having to invest what is still a reasonable amount for a MakerBot etc, and I can only see it growing at the moment!

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    Yep – I agree it’s starting and gathering momentum in snowball fashion. And I did have your two posts in mind when I talked about people I respect also discussing 3D printing – apologies for omitting the links to people like you and Dave Cushman in the post itself!

  • Bill Conan

    the plastic material used by a 3D printer is still too expensive, even the machine may be affordable. 

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    In the short term, I’d agree to some extent, although it depends on the volume you’re intending to print. Certainly when printing one-off items, and taking into account petrol, parking, purchase costs etc, it’s not so bad…

    But the cost of the material is only going to be reduced over time as more and more people look at ways of improving it, along with cheaper and cheaper hardware. To paraphrase Cory Doctorow on piracy – ‘it will never more difficult or more expensive than it is today’.

  • http://twitter.com/EndlessFormsCom EndlessForms.com

    Another project out of Hod Lipson’s lab at Cornell University is EndlessForms.com, a website where you can design objects with evolution and 3D print them. Here are a few stories on the subject: 

    http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/38433/page1/
    http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/08/evolve-your-own-objects-for-3d.html 
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44258683#.TlWtj3PgX10 

  • http://twitter.com/EndlessFormsCom EndlessForms.com

    Here is an outside opinion that readers of this blog might find interesting (from the MIT Technology Review article linked above):The technology is “very impressive,” says Neri Oxman, director of the MIT Media Lab’s Mediated Matter research group. She believes the user-friendliness of the evolutionary approach could help drive the broader adoption of 3-D printing technologies, similar to how easy-to-use image editors fueled the growth of digital photography and graphic manipulation. “People could scan their own toothbrushes or other objects and evolve various designs of such items for members of their family,” says Oxman, noting that this could ultimately have an impact on design similar to the impact that blogs and social media have had on journalism, opening the field to the general public.

  • Pingback: Why Print Media Is Significant Before And Now » Politics of Israel

  • Pingback: Plane crazy

  • Dougthompson97

    It is exciting to see momentum growing in this avenue because I believe that it will help gravitate the younger generation to math, sciences and manufacturing, but it is interesting how all of these blog posts mention the least detailed, simplest technologies. The Shapeways and Makerbots of the world are doing a great job promoting their own companies, but being lost are the advancements in technology that produce good quality high detailed parts. Makerbots version of FDM and ZCorp are poor demonstrations of the quality and functionality of parts that are actually out there for people that want real world functional parts. Look at Polyjet, FDM, SLA and even SLS from the main OEM’s if you want to see real parts with incredible detail and functionality. You will get exact replicas of what you are trying to get not something that has a resemblence of it.

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    Cheers for the comment, and I’ve been thinking a lot about education, particularly as the father of a young child. Also many thanks for the tips on other manufacturers and companies to look into, and I have a suspicion I’m going to be pursuing the 3D Printing topic a lot in the future, so will definitely be checking them out.

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    Cheers – and nice quote.

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    Cheers – will definitely be looking more indepth at EndlessForms from now on!

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    The concern over raw materials is a good point, but I think economies of scale and the general progress in technology advances vs cost will mean the materials start to come down in price along with the manufacturing machines. I’d imagine most makers of 3D printers will see it as imperative if they’re aiming for widespread adoption!

  • Xnaron

    I have been printing with PLA and ABS.  I bought a PRUSA kit from makergear.com.  The kit and service are top notch.  I love 3d printing…built a 2nd and 3rd printer is on the way.  What is really cool is the MakerGear Mosaic.  It is cheaper than the Makerbots and easily twice the machine.  I will be picking one up soon for my 4th printer.

  • Mnwhowell

    Dentist use 3d printing now – I have had a crown and a bridge made – temporary ones were made while I waited – I could chew on them as normal – these were replaced by ones with different material a few weeks later

  • Annisa

     

    @font-face {
    font-family: “Geneva”;
    }@font-face {
    font-family: “Verdana”;
    }@font-face {
    font-family: “Cambria”;
    }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 10pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { color: purple; text-decoration: underline; }div.Section1 { page: Section1;Hi Dan, thanks for the great post and I agree that
    copyright will be the challenge faced by the 3d printing industry.

    Jakajima will be hosting its first 3D Printing Event 2011
    in Eindhoven, NL on Oct 25, 2011. The copyright issue is one of the topics
    discussed during the seminar. There will be also exhibition of the current
    formats of 3d printers and 3D design competition. Eric de Bruijn, co-founder of Ultimaking,  Klaus
    Stadlmann from Vienna University of Technology, Marcello Coelho from MIT Media
    Lab are amongst the international speakers for the seminar.

    Event website: http://3dprintingevent.com.

    Competition website: http://3ddesigncompetition.com

    Thanks

  • Annisa

    Hi everyone, I’m really sorry for the appearance of my post below.

    Bottom line is that I agree that copyright will the challenge in 3d printing. I also wanted to share that Jakajima will be hosting 3D Printing Event 2011 in Eindhoven, NL on Oct 25, 2011. There will be seminar, exihibition and 3d design competition. The copyright topic will be discussed in the seminar too. Erik de Bruijn from Ultimaking is one the international speakers.
    Event website: http://3dprintingevent.com

    Sorry again!

  • Julie

    That’s one of the huge advantages of Z Corp’s 3D printers. The material costs are the most affordable in the industry, at only $0.12-$0.18 (USD) per cubic inch. The open source printers might be inexpensive to purchase, but the ongoing materials costs are prohibitive. The build speeds are also painfully slow and the quality, resolution are not suitable for commercial use. On can also only print one prototype at a time on the open source printers. The are also only monochrome – no color.  ZPrinters build at 1 vertical inch per hour, you can stack and nest parts in the build chamber, they’re the fastest in the industry and are the only multicolor 3D printers.  They are most suitable in product design, when doing concept modeling, but are also proven as durable functional prototypes when stiff prototype properties are required.

  • Julie

    We completely agree that the Shapeways, Landprint, World of Warcraft, iMaterialise, etc. sites of the world will serve the ever-expanding consumer market. The average person does not know how (and will not learn how) to design in 3D CAD.  If they want a 3D printed product, they will order it online. The open source printers are only suitable for the relatively small hobbiest market.

  • Tim

    Dan is right, 3D printing does very much seem to be on the cusp of going massive.  At http://www.emco.co.uk we are getting enquiries for potential new applications continually.  People really seem to have connected with the idea of 3D printing and it seems to be opening the doors on a seemingly endless stream of possible applications. 

    We deal with machines like the zcorp 3D printers from the video above. However I think that it is the smaller machines and the open source projects that are driving interest.

  • http://www.thewayoftheweb.net Dan Thornton

    You don’t need to design in 3D CAD.

    You just need to be able to download a 3D CAD image licensed under Creative Commons.

  • Anonymous

    3D Printing is not really accessible for everyone yet if not knowing 3d software. I know in Switzerland they opened up the first 3D Printing Walk in Shop in Zurich http://www.3d-model.ch.
    Do you think there is potential “fabbing for everyone” They are also using personal printers like the BFB http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Jpf5FWJOj94 

  • Pingback: The two sides of 3D Printing

  • Pingback: Quora

  • Pingback: 5 essential books for geeks… - TheWayoftheWeb

  • Bsurfside

    Same here , within 17,5 min ,I timed, my new crown was manufactured it fits perfectly .So my dentist does not have ship the cast to a lab ,I do not have to wait about 10 days,the only thing is as he told me ;to break even he has to do at least 25 crowns per month at about $1400. each

  • ferrondoyle

    The all new 3D printing technology seems really god but I don’t think this is going to become very big. This is god to use in several places such as jewel shop  where you can see the printed 3D version of your jewellery same to same.

  • Pingback: Key trends for 2012: Digital Disruptions gets Physical

  • Pingback: TheWayoftheWeb Most Read Posts in 2011 - TheWayoftheWeb

  • Pingback: Technology in Education